Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500

Below, you can read the comparison between two mirrorless cameras that are equipped with 24MP APS-C image sensors, Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500. In terms of performance and image quality, both models are impressive. Still, there are some differences that set the two apart. Which one will give you the best value for the money?

Continue reading to find out more about:
– The size and weight of each camera
– The handling and ergonomics of each camera
– The connectivity and features of each camera
– The comparison of their image and video quality
– The battery life of Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500
– Which camera that is generally more recommended

Size and Weight
First, let’s take a look at the dimensions of each camera. Both are mirrorless cameras, so they are relatively smaller and lighter than DSLR units. Hence, they can be great options for people who need portable cameras that are capable of shooting images with great quality. However, they are still bulkier than compact digital cameras. See also: Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6000.

Canon EOS M50 measures 116 mm x 88 mm x 59 mm. It has a weight of about 390 grams. Compared to Sony A6500, it is noticeably lighter, although not by much. It is a little bit thicker. It will be difficult to pocket, unless you put it in a large pocket of a jacket. The housing is mostly polycarbonate. This is why Canon EOS M50 can be lighter than Sony A6500. Still, the overall build quality feels solid.

Sony A6500 measures 120 mm x 67 mm x 53 mm. The weight is about 453 grams. It has a longer body, but it is slimmer and shorter. As the effect, it is generally more portable and easier to carry around. It can fit inside some pockets, but the weight will still make it uncomfortable. Carrying it with a dedicated bag or pouch is generally more preferred. Sony A6500 has a magnesium alloy construction which feels highly sturdy and durable.

In terms of build quality, both are good. Canon EOS M50 feels solid in the DSLR-style design. Unfortunately, it is not weather-sealed. As the effect, it will not be able to withstand bad weather. This is something that you need to consider carefully if you want to bring camera for some outdoor adventures. On the other hand, Sony A6500 has a solid and sturdy housing that is weather-sealed, so the camera can withstand exposure to rain, snow, or dusty wind.

Ergonomics
In terms of handling and ergonomics, both Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500 are great. Depending on your personal preference, you may prefer the traditional DSLR design of Canon EOS M50 or the modern, streamlined design of Sony A6500.

Canon EOS M50 has been designed along the lines of a traditional DSLR design. It features a beefy grip with a viewfinder which is positioned on the top-center of the rear panel. There are also several control dials that protrude from the top plate to allow you to adjust various settings quickly.

Sony A6500 is shaped with a more boxy design. It is relatively more streamlined. It is a good choice for people who prefer a more contemporary look. That said, you should not mistake the simpler layout for a lack of control. The many buttons on the body are customizable to provide quick access to various settings.

Both of the two cameras have a built-in flash which will spring up from the top plate when released. They each also have a hot shoe which will allow you to mount a more powerful external flash.

Features
Canon EOS M50 is equipped with a 3-inch fully articulating display screen. Hence, it will allow very flexible shooting positions. It supports touchscreen control, which can be handy for adjusting the focus points. It is equipped with a 2360k-dot electronic viewfinder.

Canon EOS M50 is not really designed for continuous shooting. Although it has a nice maximum photo burst rate of 10 fps, the buffer capacity is very limited. It can only take 36 JPEG shots or 10 RAW shots before the buffer is filled up.

Sony A6500 also has a 3-inch display with touchscreen support, but it can only tilt in vertical directions. This is still useful for shooting from an above-head or below-hip position, as well as for taking selfies. It has a 2359k-dot electronic viewfinder.

Sony A6500 has much better continuous shooting. It has a maximum photo burst rate of 11.1 fps in JPEG and RAW. The buffer capacity is very generous. It will allow you to take 231 JPEG shots or 110 RAW shots before the buffer is filled and processed. So, this camera is especially great for sports and wildlife photography.

Autofocus
Both Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500 are equipped with hybrid autofocus systems with contrast detection and phase detection. In general, both cameras are fast and reliable. However, Sony A6500 is still the one with the superior autofocus performance.

Canon EOS M50 is armed with 143 focus points. It works with the Dual Pixel technology, which enhances the tracking accuracy and speed. It can track moving subjects very well in good lighting conditions. It struggles a bit in low-light, but still quite reliable. When shooting a video in 1080p Full HD, the autofocus is nearly flawless. However, when shooting in 4K Ultra HD, the autofocus is somewhat slow.

Sony A6500 is really awesome with the 425 focus points. It has the 4D Focus system, and it is very fast and accurate. It is able to track fast-moving subjects in various lighting conditions. It will not lose its focus even when the subject is going towards the edge of the frame. The autofocus works very well in video recording, too, in both 1080p Full HD and 4K Ultra HD.

Image Quality
So, how is the image quality of Canon EOS M50vs Sony A6500? Well, since each of the two cameras here uses a 24.2MP APS-C image sensor, they both are capable of producing great quality images. Each of them has an ISO range of 100 – 25,600. However, Canon EOS M50 does not have the ability to extend its ISO range, whereas Sony A6500 has an extended ISO value of 51,200 which can be handy when needed.

To support their powerful image sensors, these cameras also come with updated processing engines. Canon EOS M50 is equipped with the DIGIC 7 engine, which is the same one used by Canon EOS 77D and Canon EOS 80D. It is quite fast and reliable. However, it still feels somewhat slower than Sony A6500, which comes with the BIONZ X engine, revised algorithms, and a new front-end LSI chip. Sony A6500 is slightly faster when turning on and processing images.

Both cameras come with five-axis image stabilization. However, the IS on Canon EOS M50 is electronic and only works when recording videos. Meanwhile, the IS on Sony A6500 is mechanical and is usable for still images as well as videos. Both cameras are able to use image-stabilized lenses, and these lenses will work in conjunction with their built-in image stabilization systems. However, even when using IS lenses, Canon EOS M50 still has an inferior stabilization performance compared to Sony A6500.

Video Quality
In terms of video quality, both Canon EOS M50 and Sony A6500 are awesome. Both models are able to record 4K Ultra HD (3840 x 2160 pixels) videos. However, the maximum frame rate of Canon EOS M50 at this resolution is only 24 fps, whereas Sony A6500 can offer a maximum frame rate of 30 fps.

Both cameras can benefit from their advanced autofocus systems for tracking subjects in video recording. Although Canon EOS M50 only has 143 focus points, the tracking performance is still fairly good. Sony A6500 with the 425 focus points has totally no problem in tracking moving subjects in various conditions.

Nevertheless, the difference in their image stabilization brings some noticeable effects in video recording. As explained above, the five-axis IS of Canon EOS M50 can be used when recording a video, and it is very useful for reducing blurs. However, the mechanical five-axis IS of Sony A6500 is superior for reducing vibrations when you are shooting with bare hands without a tripod.

Each camera is equipped with a microphone input port for use with an external mic. However, neither of them has a headphone jack for audio monitoring during a video recording.

Battery Life
Lastly, let’s take a look at the battery life. This is essential, especially if you often bring your camera on a long trip. The last thing that you want to happen when you are outdoor with your camera is running out of battery.

Canon EOS M50 has a relatively short battery life. It can only take 250 shots per charge. Unfortunately, it can’t be recharged by a USB powerbank; you will need to detach the battery and use a recharger device.Many users recommend getting spare batteries so that you will be able to swap when you run out of power.

Sony A6500 has a better battery life. It can last for about 350 shots per charge. This is not very long, but it is still better than Canon EOS M50. You may still want to buy a spare battery if you are planning to bring it along on a long trip. Alternatively, it can be recharged by a suitable USB powerbank with the right voltage and amperage.

Canon EOS M50 vs Sony A6500

- Dual Pixel CMOS AF for fast, accurate autofocus that helps you get the photo you want right as the moment happens
- 24.1 Megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor and the DIGIC 8 Image Processor delivers incredible color, clear details, and stunning range
- Vari-angle Touchscreen LCD has a flexible tilt range ideal for high-angle and low-angle shooting, and reviewing your photos
- Built-in high-resolution electronic viewfinder features approximately 2,360,000 dots to see high amounts of detail when capturing
- Automatically transfer your files to your compatible device for easy backup and online uploading with automatic image transfer
- 24.2MP APS-C Exmore sensor with advanced processing up to Iso 51.200
- Wide 425 phase detection AF points, Fast 0.05 sec. AF acquisition
- 5-Axis In-body image stabilization steadies every Lens
- 11Fps continuous shooting to 269 Frames6 at 24.2MP with AE/AF tracking
- In the box: Lens hood; Lens cap; Lens rear cap; Rechargeable Battery NP-FW50; AC Adaptor: AC-UUD12; Shoulder strap; Body cap; Accessory shoe cap; Eyepiece cup; Micro USB cable

Conclusion
Of the two, Sony A6500 is definitely the winner. This camera has better overall features and performance. It has impressive continuous shooting performance. The autofocus is generally faster and more reliable due to having more focus points. The mechanical five-axis image stabilization is usable for stills and videos. And, the battery life is slightly longer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *